Data exchanges impact an increasing range of disciplines. This makes it natural and
imperative to work with vendors to enable as many end-users as possible to exchange their
CAD data. Actually, interoperability issues have increased the need for data exchange and
considerably exceeded the scope of CAD.
CAD models provide a working basis for more and more disciplines.
The technology is based on the modelling paradigms used in the original models and
assemblies. Hence its strong attachment to native formats, which alone let users recover
complete CAD data structures and maximise the number of entities exchanged, Datakit can
make a commitment to be able to read specific items of data.
Datakit focuses on breaking down the entities into the finest grained detail possible and on
building structures that enable data to be stored thoroughly and then used as needed by
different applications. The solutions do not work like black boxes but deliver a level of
visibility of data transfers.
In technical terms, the substantial growth over the last few years is the switch from IGES
surface data to STEP, which does a much better job in handling solids and assembling data.
The current trend is all about managing FTA modules from Catia V5, UG’s PMI and all the
other data of this type. Companies must work from these modules to increase productivity.
Exchanging 3D models that have dimensioning and tolerancing data is of course essential.
Datakit has been proactive in this area for the last years. It has been working with vendors of
data inspection solutions, for whom the ability to build this information into the 3D model is an
additional guarantee of quality. Viewer developers, who facilitate access to CAD data, are also
among our prime targets. Manufacturing departments are also interested and this could lead
to 2D paper drawings disappearing completely from many workshops.
The checks and comparisons between modelised and original models are becoming ever more
crucial issues in which Datakit is involved, as well as healing, simplifying models,
especially for viewing or manufacturing.
To conclude, reliable and complete Cad Data exchanges are key factors regarding
increasing demands to speed products launch. The recovery of the different data available in
a model, does not concern sole Cad and Engineering departments or teams. It deals with a
much more global enterprising issue.
Actually, among the fields concerned, CAD and CAM still prevail, but areas such as
metrology, prototyping, numerical simulation, visualization or rendering are better and more
and more represented. Sign of the times, new customers work in the fields of design, reverse
engineering, creation of interactive documentation, viewing, rendering and QC. |